M\u00eb 8 Mars \u2013 Dit\u00ebn Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare t\u00eb Gruas, qytetar\u00ebt irlandez\u00eb do t\u00eb votojn\u00eb n\u00eb referendum n\u00ebse do t\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsojn\u00eb apo jo klauzol\u00ebn e kushtetut\u00ebs irlandeze t\u00eb njohur si \u201cgruaja n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kjo klauzol\u00eb, e cila daton nga viti 1937, specifikon se: \u201cShteti njeh se me jet\u00ebn e saj brenda sht\u00ebpis\u00eb, gruaja i jep shtetit mb\u00ebshtetjen pa t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk mund t\u00eb arrihet e mira e p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt\u201d. M\u00eb tej thuhet se: \u201cPrandaj shteti do t\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqet t\u00eb siguroj\u00eb q\u00eb nevoja ekonomike nuk do t\u2019i detyroj grat\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb angazhohen n\u00eb pun\u00eb duke neglizhuar detyrat e tyre n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Fillimisht, q\u00ebllimi i dispozit\u00ebs ishte t\u00eb njihte r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e kujdesit n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi, i cili ofrohej ekskluzivisht nga n\u00ebnat. Q\u00ebllimi ishte q\u00eb n\u00ebnat t\u00eb mund t\u00eb q\u00ebndronin n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi e t\u00eb mos detyroheshin t\u00eb punonin p\u00ebr arsye financiare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Megjithat\u00eb, ndihma shtet\u00ebrore e n\u00ebnkuptuar nga formulimi nuk u zbatua kurr\u00eb n\u00eb praktik\u00eb. Grat\u00eb kurr\u00eb nuk u mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebn financiarisht p\u00ebr t\u00eb ofruar kujdes n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi. M\u00eb keq, kushtetuta shpesh p\u00ebrdorej p\u00ebr t\u00eb legjitimuar argumentet se vendi i gruas ishte n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi dhe se politikat q\u00eb p\u00ebrjashtonin grat\u00eb nga puna ishin t\u00eb pranueshme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tani, si pjes\u00eb e nj\u00eb referendumi t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb, qytetar\u00ebt irlandez\u00eb do t\u00eb ken\u00eb mund\u00ebsin\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshojn\u00eb kushtetut\u00ebn n\u00eb nj\u00eb formulim neutral ndaj gjinis\u00eb. Poashtu me nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr votim ata do t\u00eb vendosin n\u00ebse duhet ndryshuar p\u00ebrkufizimi kushtetues i familjes dhe t\u00eb zgjerohet edhe p\u00ebrtej martes\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00c7far\u00eb rrezikohet?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Para mbajtjes s\u00eb referendumit duket se ka lindur nj\u00ebfar\u00eb paqart\u00ebsie mes disa grupeve q\u00eb argumentojn\u00eb se heqja e referenc\u00ebs p\u00ebr grat\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb heqja e \u00e7do t\u00eb drejte t\u00eb grave p\u00ebr t\u00eb q\u00ebndruar n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb rritur f\u00ebmij\u00ebt e tyre.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Megjithat\u00eb, realiteti \u00ebsht\u00eb se dispozita nuk ka rezultuar kurr\u00eb n\u00eb ndonj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb p\u00ebr grat\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb q\u00ebndrojn\u00eb n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi. As n\u00eb ndonj\u00eb detyrim ekonomik p\u00ebr shtetin q\u00eb t\u00eb ndihmoj grat\u00eb q\u00eb zgjedhin ta b\u00ebjn\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb kryesisht p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb formulimit q\u00eb k\u00ebrkon vet\u00ebm q\u00eb shteti t\u00eb \u2018p\u00ebrpiqet\u2019 p\u00ebr t\u00eb ofruar nj\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetje t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Efektivisht, kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se qeveria duhet vet\u00ebm t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekje dhe nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb e detyruar t\u00eb ndihmoj\u00eb. \u00c7do p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur dispozit\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb siguruar k\u00ebt\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb ka d\u00ebshtuar n\u00eb gjykata. Pra, dispozita aktuale nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb anakroniz\u00ebm, por edhe e kot\u00eb. Asnj\u00ebher\u00eb nuk ka pasur efekt juridik pozitiv. P\u00ebrkundrazi, na mbetet deklarata, n\u00eb ligjin m\u00eb themelor t\u00eb shtetit, se grat\u00eb (dhe jo burrat) kan\u00eb detyra q\u00eb duhet t’i kryejn\u00eb n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kjo pjes\u00eb e kushtetut\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb diskutuar prej koh\u00ebsh dhe ka pasur shum\u00eb rekomandime p\u00ebr ta fshir\u00eb ose z\u00ebvend\u00ebsuar at\u00eb. E fundit prej tyre erdhi nga nj\u00eb asamble qytetare e krijuar me q\u00ebllimin e k\u00ebshillimit lidhur me fatin e klauzol\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
N\u00eb vitin 2022, kjo asamble votoi p\u00ebr z\u00ebvend\u00ebsimin e klauzol\u00ebs me nj\u00eb alternativ\u00eb neutrale ndaj gjinis\u00eb. Por asambleja gjithashtu donte q\u00eb fjal\u00ebt t\u00eb kishin kuptim e t\u00eb mos b\u00ebheshin thjesht simbolik\u00eb, k\u00ebshtu q\u00eb propozoi nj\u00eb formulim q\u00eb do ta detyronte shtetin t\u00eb merrte masa t\u00eb arsyeshme p\u00ebr t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur kujdesin, duke u inspiruar nga formulime t\u00eb ngjashme n\u00eb kushtetut\u00ebn e Afrik\u00ebs<\/p>\n\n\n\n
s\u00eb Jugut. Nj\u00eb komision parlamentar i ngritur p\u00ebr t\u00eb shqyrtuar propozimet gjithashtu miratoi k\u00ebt\u00eb formulim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Megjithat\u00eb, qeveria irlandeze ka vendosur t’u jap\u00eb njer\u00ebzve nj\u00eb version t\u00eb zbutur. Amendamenti i propozuar n\u00eb referendum thot\u00eb: Shteti njeh se dh\u00ebnia e kujdesit nga an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e nj\u00eb familjeje ndaj nj\u00ebri-tjetrit, p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb lidhjeve q\u00eb ekzistojn\u00eb midis tyre, i jep shoq\u00ebris\u00eb nj\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetje pa t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk mund t\u00eb arrihet e mira e p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt dhe do t\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqet ta mb\u00ebshtes\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb dispozit\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nj\u00eb ndryshim i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm, por nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi e humbur<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Formulimi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb zhg\u00ebnjim p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb kishin shtyr\u00eb p\u00ebr reforma. Nd\u00ebrsa z\u00ebvend\u00ebson gjuh\u00ebn gjinore dhe heq n\u00ebnkuptimin se vendi i duhur i nj\u00eb gruaje \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi, ai d\u00ebshton t\u00eb angazhoj\u00eb shtetin p\u00ebr t\u00eb ofruar mb\u00ebshtetje p\u00ebr njer\u00ebzit q\u00eb punojn\u00eb n\u00eb sht\u00ebpi duke u kujdesur p\u00ebr t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt. Ashtu si p\u00ebrpara referendumit, ato nuk mund t\u00eb presin q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrfitojn\u00eb apo t\u00eb marrin t\u00eb drejta q\u00eb i kompensojn\u00eb p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb pun\u00eb thelb\u00ebsore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Teksti i propozuar thjesht z\u00ebvend\u00ebson fjal\u00ebn \u2018p\u00ebrpjekje ose endeavour\u2019 me fjal\u00ebn \u2018p\u00ebrpiqem ose strive\u2019. Kjo do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se nuk ka gjasa t\u00eb rezultoj\u00eb me ndonj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb konkrete apo ndonj\u00eb detyrim ligjor nga ana e shtetit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pra, nd\u00ebrsa nj\u00eb anakroniz\u00ebm historik duket se do t\u00eb korrigjohet me k\u00ebt\u00eb referendum, Irland\u00ebs i k\u00ebrkohet n\u00eb thelb t\u00eb z\u00ebvend\u00ebsoj\u00eb nj\u00eb nen jo-funksional me gjuh\u00eb t\u00eb vjet\u00ebruar dhe patronizuese me nj\u00eb nen t\u00eb ri jo-funksional por me gjuh\u00eb pak m\u00eb t\u00eb pranueshme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Edhe pse mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb zhg\u00ebnjyese q\u00eb nuk pritet t\u00eb rrjedhin t\u00eb drejta apo detyra pozitive, heqja nga kushtetuta e nj\u00eb mentaliteti t\u00eb viteve 1930 q\u00eb nuk pasqyron n\u00eb asnj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb realitetin e jet\u00ebs irlandeze n\u00eb shekullin 21-t\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn nj\u00eb p\u00ebrmir\u00ebsim dhe me siguri ia vlen nj\u00eb vot\u00eb pro.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Laura Cahillane<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E p\u00ebrktheu: Blenda Asllani<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Shkrimin original mund t\u2019a gjeni n\u00eb<\/strong> https:\/\/theconversation.com\/according-to-irelands-constitution-a-womans-duties-are-in-the-home-but-a-referendum-could-be-about-to-change-its-sexist-wording-222477<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":8562,"template":"","class_list":["post-8561","lexo-post","type-lexo-post","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n